| Competitive Intelligence & Perceptions Management num Blog-Notas, para tornar o obscuro bastante mais... CLARO |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome Home: o apoio da IAVA aos veteranos...
IAVA - Iraq and Afeghanistan Veterans of America O GRANDE BUSINESS DAS ONG Já há mais de 20 anos que ficou claro o interesse da máfia italiana por ONGs... Para actuar não só na Europa mas também em África, Ásia e América Latina. E até para usar, em projectos próprios, financiamentos oficiais. E também para aparecer no terreno com instrumentos respeitáveis. E, eventualmente, por muitas outras razões que eles lá saberiam... Para muita gente ficou claro, então, que as ONG tinham perdido a inocência! Outros casos menos radicais foram, entretanto, aparecendo e que pouco abonavam a “marca” ONG. Nada disto, porém, impediu que, nas últimas décadas, este segmento de actividade económica tivesse um enorme desenvolvimento e se afirmasse como um grande e pesado “business” global. É a análise desse business, feita pela Infoguerre, que aqui apresentamos: · Le business de l'aide humanitaire Depuis quelques années, l'humanitaire fait l'objet d'une course effrénée, où la concurrence peut être vive. Qui contrôle ces fonds philanthropiques qui, à eux seuls, pèsent 600 milliards de dollars ? José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 28, 2008 23:02 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica FILME DO TERRORISMO ISLAMISTA EM BOMBAIM
José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 28, 2008 20:31 |
link | comments
Tags: homeland security, terrorismo
PRINCESSE TAM TAM MORTE EM BOMBAIM Terroristas islamistas assassinam princesa da lingerie... no massacre de Bombaim. Bombay: mort de la fondatrice de Princesse Tam-Tam Loumia Hiridjee et son époux Mourad Amarsy sont les deux Français à avoir trouvé la mort dans les attentats perpétrés en Inde. Articles liés: L'Inde s'inquiète pour son économie La fondatrice du groupe de lingerie féminine Princesse Tam Tam, Loumia Hiridjee, et son époux Mourad Amarsy, ont été tués lors des attentats à Bombay, a annoncé vendredi 28 novembre à l'AFP Roland de Farcy, président du groupe.
Loumia Hiridjee s'occupait toujours de la marque rachetée fin 2005 Son mari, Mourad Amarsy, 49 ans, ancien président de Princesse Tam Tam, "gardait aussi un oeil sur le groupe. José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 28, 2008 19:31 |
link | comments
Tags: moda, terrorismo, fotos e vÃdeos, sexo e cidade OS ATAQUES JIHADISTAS NA INDIA Twitter comes of age reporting on Mumbai attacksBy Roderick JonesThe micro-blogging service Twitter has been providing updates to the attacks in Mumbai. Some of the commentary and links are off-base but it is a fascinating view into how the 'crowd' can monitor and report on real-time events. For example, there is a link posted to a 'google doc' spreadsheet listing known casualties. Link here. Terrorist attacks may remain disturbingly similar but the way they are reported and examined changes in step with the rapid pace of virtualization.
Mumbai Terror attacks: Urban Jihad comes to IndiaBy Walid PharesAs we write this short early assessment of the Terror attacks in Mumbai, events are still unforlding in the financial capital of the sub Indian region. Counter Terrorism units are battling armed elements inside several buildings including the Taj Hotel where hostages have been seized, including foreigners. My first round of monitoring included a discussion with our colleague Animesh Roul who has also posted a report on CTB. I must credit a number of facts and assumptions to him including the projection that the perpetrators -although calling themselves Deccan Mujahideen- are in fact members or trained by Lashkar e Toiba/SIMI (who according to Animesh Roul now call themselves Indian Mujahideen). Here is the condensed report I discussed on Fox News, the BBC, Russia Today TV and other international outlets. Read More » Type of Operation According to sources in Mumbai, armed groups and individuals have attacked at least ten (if not more) targets inside the city including the Taj Hotel, Oberoi Hotel, a railway Station, the Leopold Café and other locations. More shooting incidents have been also reported at the Trident hotel, a hospital and a highway leading to the airport and Assembly Hall. The terrorists fired indiscriminately against civilians, security elements, lobbed grenades, and killed Counter Terrorism officials. At this writing sources are reporting more than 102 deaths, amd hundreds wounded, in addition to hostage taking. Indian security sources confirmed the use of AK-47s, small arms, grenade, etc. This type of operation, involving a number of small groups and individuals "deployed" across several avenues, In my book Future Jihad I coined these types of forthcoming strikes as "urban Jihad" (Chapter 13). Instead of bombers and suicide bombers, the command sends "Jihadi infantry." The tactical goal of these actions is to engage in different types of missions: random kilings, chaos, killing of security officers and hostage taking. In our estimate, this attack is a “complex” type, where small operations are aimed at creating chaos and triggering security deployment in many areas, while more precise operations could target higher targets such as hostage taking or similar situation. We will probably know more when the dust will settle. Perpetrators In view of the historical context, precedents and latest analysis, the most likely groups that may be behind these attacks are the Lashkar e Toiba/SIMI (they now call themselves Indian Mujahideen). These groups are Jihadists, have links to the other organizations in Kashmir but also inside Pakistan with pro-Taliban elements and eventually Al Qaeda. The ideological identification is most likely Jihadist although the group almost surely will issue a more than one release to claim the attack and put it in context. According to Indian sources this is an operation of a very new type in India. The "emirs" have sent these armed elements in their 20s to strike at Indian psyche. One goal is to sink the Pakistani-Indian rapprochement. In Islamabad, the new Government is engaged in operations against the big Jihadi boys ojn the north western frontier. It is quite possible that the Mumbai attacks aim at triggering tensions between the two old foes so that pressure would be released against the radicals in Pakistan. In any event, this is a large Jihadi operation against one of the emerging economies and the largest democraciy n Asia. The goal is to target India as a power engaged in the War on Terror but also to further destabilize the region, including Pakistan and its neighbor Afghanistan.” ************ Dr Walid Phares is the Director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. « Close It India's Financial Hub Mumbai under Multiple Terror Attacks!By Animesh RoulCo-Editor's Note: See the "Newslinks" box for links to updated news on the attacks. The needle of the suspicion is on the Lashkar- e- Toiba and Student Islamic Movement of India combine (Now they credibly calling and proving them as Indian Mujahedeen terror group). The incidents took place one day after the reported arrest of Lashkar -e-Toiba linked Raheel Sheikh by the Interpol in London. Raheel is one of the alleged masterminds of the conspiracy and was involved in the funding of the July 11, 2006, Mumbai serial train blasts that killed nearly 200 commuters and wounded over 500 people on that fateful day. Read More » Media Reports on the Terror Strikes: Multiple attacks in Mumbai, 80 dead, hostages taken Mumbai terror attack: top floor of Hotel Taj on fire ATS chief, over 50 others killed in Mumbai terror strikes Mumbai under attack: 60 dead, 200 injured « Close It José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 27, 2008 18:53 |
link | comments
Tags: mudança do modelo global, terrorismo
"Sex and the City" FAZER OS DESEJOS A KIM CATTRALL... SEX AND THE RENAISSANCE La comédienne de "Sex and the City", Kim Cattrall, apparaît dans une photographie de Tom Hunter recréant un tableau du Titien, "Diane et Actéon", et milite pour que l'œuvre soit visible du grand public. in Libé Ok, aqui lhe fazemos a vontade que ela, claro, merece... e Tiziano o merece muito mais! José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 26, 2008 20:00 |
link | comments
Tags: humor, fotos e vÃdeos, sexo e cidade GRANDE IRONIA...
Oliveira e Costa detido por major Dez militares da Brigada Fiscal da GNR, comandados por um major, irromperam na passada quinta-feira, dia 20, pela quinta de Oliveira e Costa no Cartaxo para deter o ex-presidente do Banco Português (...)José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 26, 2008 18:42 |
link | comments
Tags: complexo salazarento e neo-corpo, visto de lisboa A coisa está mesmo preta e, note-se, as premissas da OCDE - como ela mesmo reconhece - são optimistas...
«De nombreux pays de l’OCDE subissent ou vont connaître une récession prolongée d’une ampleur qui est sans précédent depuis le début des années 80. En conséquence, le nombre de chômeurs dans la zone de l’OCDE pourrait augmenter de 8 millions ces deux prochaines années. Dans le même temps, l’inflation refluera dans tous les pays de l’OCDE, certains étant même exposés à un risque – certes faible – de déflation. Ce numéro des Perspectives économiques contient des prévisions nettement plus pessimistes que celles qu’on pouvait faire il y a seulement quelques mois ; en effet, un grand nombre des risques d’évolution négative qu’on avait pu recenser précédemment se sont concrétisés. Les turbulences financières qui ont éclaté aux États-Unis vers le milieu de 2007 ont gagné le secteur financier non bancaire et ont rapidement contaminé le reste du monde. Après la faillite de Lehman Brothers à la mi-septembre, une perte générale de confiance dans les relations entre les institutions financières a déclenché des réactions proches du « black-out » sur les marchés mondiaux de capitaux. Les écarts de taux sur les marchés du crédit et les marchés obligataires sont rapidement montés à des niveaux très élevés, paralysant les marchés du crédit et les marchés monétaires. L’action rapide et massive des pouvoirs publics pour le rétablissement de la confiance et l’apport de liquidités paraît être parvenue à limiter la période de panique, mais l’impératif demeure pour les institutions financières de se désendetter et d’assainir leurs bilans. Ce processus d’ajustement, qui prendra du temps et nuira à la distribution du crédit, est le principal facteur qui pèsera à l’avenir sur l’activité. Je tiens à souligner d’emblée l’extrême incertitude qui entoure ces Perspectives économiques de l’OCDE, surtout en ce qui concerne les hypothèses sur le rythme auquel la crise des marchés de capitaux – responsable au premier chef du ralentissement économique – pourra être surmontée. Plus précisément, nous supposons que les énormes tensions financières qui se manifestent depuis la mi-septembre seront de brève durée, mais ouvriront une longue période de dérèglements financiers jusqu’à la fin de 2009, le retour à la normale se faisant ensuite progressivement. Dans ces conditions et compte tenu de nos hypothèses habituelles de maintien des taux de change et du prix du pétrole à leurs niveaux récents, les principales caractéristiques des perspectives économiques sont les suivantes : Aux États-Unis, la production diminue au premier semestre de l’an prochain, puis se redresse progressivement à mesure que l’impact de la crise du crédit s’atténue, la baisse dans le secteur de l’immobilier prend fin et la relance due à la politique monétaire produit ses effets. Mais la reprise sera probablement languissante, la consommation étant freinée par les fortes pertes patrimoniales des ménages. L’inflation reflue très nettement, le repli récent des prix des matières premières se diffusant dans l’économie et le sous-emploi des ressources faisant pression à la baisse sur les prix. Dans la zone euro, l’activité se contracte elle aussi ces six prochains mois, car le durcissement des conditions financières, la faible progression des revenus et les effets de richesse négatifs résultant de la baisse des prix des actions et des logements freinent la consommation et l’investissement. Puis l’activité économique se redresse progressivement à mesure que l’assouplissement monétaire se fait sentir et les effets des turbulences financières mondiales s’estompent. L’inflation diminuera fortement pour revenir au début de l’année prochaine à un niveau conforme à l’objectif d’inflation de • Le Japon n’a pas été l’épicentre de la crise financière, mais après un bref accès de croissance au début de 2009, à la faveur d’une relance budgétaire, la production devrait stagner au second semestre de 2009, le ralentissement économique mondial et l’appréciation récente du yen réduisant la demande extérieure. Avec un sous-emploi persistant des ressources économiques et une progression anémique des salaires, la déflation pourrait être de retour au milieu de 2009. • Parmi les autres pays de l’OCDE où le ralentissement économique sera très marqué, il faut citer l’Espagne, • Hors de la zone de l’OCDE, les principaux pays subissent eux aussi dans de nombreux cas un ralentissement économique, sous l’effet conjugué de quatre facteurs : les conditions de crédit plus restrictives au niveau international, un durcissement intérieur de la politique économique, les pertes de recettes dues à la baisse des prix des produits de base et l’affaiblissement de la demande émanant des pays de l’OCDE. Mais le ralentissement de la croissance intervient à partir de niveaux élevés. La crise financière n’est pas le seul élément déterminant dans les prévisions. Un autre facteur important est l’ajustement en cours dans le secteur du logement, qui est loin d’être terminé dans un grand nombre d’économies européennes à en juger par les cycles précédents de l’immobilier. De plus, cet ajustement s’ajoute aux effets négatifs de patrimoine liés à la chute des cours des actions. Ces facteurs récessifs sont en partie compensés par les mesures de relance monétaire de grande ampleur – dont certaines prennent des formes n’ayant rien de traditionnel – qui ont été introduites récemment et dont il a été tenu compte dans les prévisions, et aussi par l’augmentation dont ont bénéficié les revenus réels des ménages grâce à la baisse sensible des prix des matières premières. Les prévisions sont entourées de risques à la fois à la hausse et à la baisse, mais ce sont les risques baissiers qui prévalent pour 2009. Les principaux risques inclut un délai plus long que prévu avant que la situation financière se normalise, de nouvelles faillites d’institutions financières et la possibilité que des économies de marché émergentes soient plus durement touchées par le ralentissement du commerce mondial et la réévaluation des risques perçus par les investisseurs étrangers… » Ver PDF aqui
José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 25, 2008 23:31 |
link | comments
Tags: portugal, curvas da economia, mudança do modelo global
MR. BARROSO, I PRESUME... Depois de acabar de ouvir Barroso na televisão, recordo-me e invoco este simpático e optimista humor celta:
APARELHO DO PS FRANCÊS DÁ A VITÓRIA A MARTINE AUBRY Decisão instala a guerra civil no partido É uma benção para Sarkozy! O PS parte-se em dois, com o aparelho a queimar as possiblidades de Ségolène Royal e a formar quadrado à volta da filha de Jacques Delors (em nada parecida com o pai...). Com a vantagem de 42 votos (em 135.000!) já reduzida a 4 (quatro!) e com alguns milhares de votos suspeitos por examinar, FRançois Hollande faz uma última maldade à ex-mulher e manda declarar M. Aubry vencedora! Os media franceses esta tarde adoptaram uma linguagem belicista para referir a situação. "Putsch", "ultimatum": le PS bascule dans la guerre civile. "Après le premier travail de la commission hier (lundi), il n'y a plus que quatre voix d'écart sur 135.000 votants entre les deux candidates", a déclaré l'eurodéputé sur France-Info. Selon les résultats donnés par le PS vendredi soir après le vote des militants, la maire de Lille devançait Ségolène Royal de 42 voix. M. Peillon a regretté que la commission de récolement, chargée d'examiner les litiges sur le vote des militants pour l'élection du nouveau premier secrétaire, se soit "interrompue bizarrement à 17H00" alors même "qu'il y a encore des suspicions sur plusieurs centaines ou milliers de voix". PS: Martine Aubry officiellement élue à la tête des socialistes ( contient une vidéo ) Royal-Aubry: deux conceptions du parti diamétralement opposées José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 25, 2008 17:21 |
link | comments
Tags: insólito mas real, visto de esquerda, fotos e vÃdeos
ACESSO DAS EMPRESAS À INTELIGÊNCIA ECONÓMICA Uma das razões que alguns empresários invocam para justificar o seu distanciamento da Inteligência Económica é a da falta de know-how ou, dito de outro modo, a falta de disponibilidade para o investimento necessário à criação na empresa de dispositivos de IE... E não vale a pena contrapor a isto que cada euro investido na IE é sempre o investimento mais bem remunerado. Mesmo que Mas há soluções para ultrapassar isto, esta incapacidade individual. Assim o compreendam o Estado e as associações empresariais, sobretudo a AIP de Rocha de Matos, que tem dado mostras de ser quem mais sensibilidade tem para a matéria. Assim as empresas o comecem a exigir... Veja-se, por exemplo, esta solução da Chambre de Commerce et Industrie de Paris, com o apoio de especialistas da ADIT, referido no jornal Le Parisien, que mostra bem como as empresas podem ter acesso à IE e ganhar (muito) com isso: José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 24, 2008 22:23 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica The End of Globalization... “Brave New War: The Next Stage of Terrorism and the End of Globalization”, de John Robb, publicado no início de 2007, oferece uma leitura da situação global, inaugurada pelos acontecimentos do “11 de Setembro” e dá a perspectiva do autor da sua evolução e da resposta possível. Em síntese, Robb dá aqui a sua leitura do tipo de modelo global que está a emergir da fim da globalização, tornada impossível pelo “11 de Setembro”. Uma visão muito radical, de resto, da possível evolução das nossas sociedades face à ameaça deste novo tipo... Ameaças que os recentes acontecimentos de pirataria no Indico (e não nas costas da Somália...) vêm precisar e que se integram no conceito de “disruption”. Mas, atenção, não são os piratas da Somália que afundam o sistema global. É o afundamento do sistema global que permite o aparecimento deste tipo de “actores” e que ocupem a boca de cena do palco mundial. De notar que Robb escreveu “Brave New War” depois da dêbacle geopolítica de 2001 mas bem antes da implosão geoeconómica do “15 de Setembro” de 2008! Do seu ponto de vista, sem dúvida que a implosão geoeconómica só vem reforçar a sua visão radical do problema... O “Defense and the National Interest” fez uma ficha de leitura que também é interessante conhecer: “Let me give away the ending: Because we are unable to decapitate, outsmart, or defend ourselves against global guerrillas, naturally occurring events, and residual nationalism from causing cascades of failure throughout the global system, we need to learn to live with the threat they present. As we have already seen, this doesn't mean an activist foreign policy that seeks to rework the world in our image, police state measures to ensure state security or spending all of our resources on protecting everything. It does mean the adoption of a philosophy of resilience that ensures that when these events to occur (and they will), we can more easily survive their impact. (p. 182) Since the end of World War II, the world's population has nearly tripled, the Internet has allowed anybody to network with everybody, nuclear weapons have made conventional war obsolete among major powers, and the fall of the This is just the static picture; the dynamics are even scarier. Global guerrillas practice something Robb calls "open source warfare," which simply means that in the modern environment, people even on different continents can form or join groups, train, and carry out operations much more quickly than in the past or by the major legacy states today. As the groups learn from each other (and a sort of Darwinism selects out the unfit), a larger pattern forms, an "emergent intelligence," similar to a marauding colony of army ants, no one of which is very sophisticated, but operating together according to simple rules, they are survivable, adaptable, and in a suitable environment, invincible. As Robb summarizes it: … the behavior of these insurgencies as a whole seems to learn, achieve goals, and engage in self-preservation, despite the vast differences in how individual groups are organized. (p. 126) Such self-organization is not unusual in modern conflict – maneuver warfare is based on similar principles. What is new, however, is that the principle is now being applied not just to the tactics on the battlefield, but to the entire "ecosystem" itself – the creation, operation, interaction, survival, and growth of armed groups. One could dismiss all of this as speculation except for a couple of facts: · Much of the software industry and a lot of the Internet (e.g., the Wikipedia) operate using the open source model today · Nothing else seems to explain the success of the people attacking our forces in To construct this model, Robb employs a number of concepts that may be new to people unfamiliar with modern systems theory: close-coupled systems, self-organization, emergent properties (particularly "intelligence"), stigmergy, and the concept of complexity arising from simple processes. He also introduces new tools for understanding how systems work in the modern world: open source insurgency, global virtual states, superempowerment, systempunkts, and "black swans." These are all powerful ideas and not in the least theoretical as Robb illustrates with events from the evening news. Whether you agree with Robb's end position or his solutions, these are concepts that are needed to describe why today's world is different from that of the Cold War. As with any rich theory, you may take these same ingredients, and others that are relevant to you, and come to different conclusions and different solutions. But you can be sure that none of the solutions will be bureaucratic hierarchies. It's brave and it's new, but is it "war"? Although Robb makes a powerful – irrefutable in my opinion – case that armed groups of various motivations do form an "ecosystem" and operate in an open source fashion, he doesn't make a strong case that we should consider it "war." Does it make sense to talk about being at "war" with an ecosystem? Is there anything wrong with calling it "war" anyway? Yes. Thinking we're at "war" against a centrally controlled enemy creates the types of abuses, things like Abu Ghraib, that add recruiting and motivating ammunition to the groups attacking us. It leads the US State Department into looking for "critical enemy elements" to eliminate (as they phrased it in the latest terrorism report), as if we were still fighting the Third Reich. Robb himself identifies another of the problems of using the war metaphor where it doesn't apply – the "knee-jerk police state." Justice Antonin Scalia, for example, told an audience at Thinking that we're at war also gives some people the idea that the military might be the answer. So we outspend the rest of the world, combined, and wonder why, despite virtually breaking the Army, we can't prevail against what appear to be a bunch of rag-tag guerrillas. Robb explains why, and if you read the paragraph that I opened this review with, you'll see that we could double defense spending yet again and not accomplish our goals. The war metaphor is powerful, though, and as if to illustrate its dangers, even Robb falls prey to it: Over time, perhaps in as little as twenty years, and as the leverage provided by technology increases, this threshold will finally reach its culmination – with the ability of one man to declare war on the world and win. (p. 8; emphasis in original) Robb got a little carried away with this one. No, Dr. No isn't lurking under some Solutions Robb proposes a modern version of survivalism. We won't all be holed up in cabins in the woods, a la the Unabomber. But if we are living in a world that is "tightly coupled," where a glitch in the power system in Robb's general strategy is to improve resilience by any means possible. I could imagine, for example, that instead of building new power plants that, along with their distribution systems, are vulnerable to disruption, the government provides market incentives to improve resilience. The government could increase subsidies to utilities and require all of them to buy electricity from homeowners during the day and sell it at reduced rates at night. As more people add power generation capability to their houses - solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, whatever - resilience improves. This may not be the most efficient solution, but in the age of open source insurgency, too much efficiency can be dangerous. Government or no government, market forces guide behavior. As Robb notes, private individuals with the means to do so are opting out of the public security system, similar to how they withdrew from public schools. Companies are springing up to compete for this business, and it's not the same lowest-bidder rent-a-cop outfits that you see at airports and malls. As these new private security companies skim off the cream of the security business, governments will be left with the dregs: The poor will migrate to urban megaclusters where Big Brother will watch their every move (p. 186). At the national level, private military companies (PMCs) are already providing defense-related services to governments, including protecting You may not like this trend, but it is here to stay. For one thing, it is certainly working very well for the groups we are fighting. To compete against a hostile ecosystem, Robb recommends using market forces as much as we can to build resilience into our own country, while learning to use the power of open source networks to provide the residual national security we do need – in cooperation with like-minded states and other groups. In this regard, the US Department of Defense is part of the problem, not the solution (pp. 163, 176-177) and, one presumes, will have to be decommissioned. Recommendation John has produced an important book that should help jar the Whether you agree with his solutions is not important. However, the pieces of the problem are real and we are going to have to create ways to deal with open source conflict – an intelligence that emerges through the dynamic interaction of religious fanatics, street gangs, criminal cartels, and at times even other states – or face a series of disruptions that will severely degrade our quality of life.” José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 24, 2008 19:42 |
link | comments
Tags: livros, homeland security, inteligência estratégica, mudança do modelo global GLOBALIZATION: THE END… OU O "FIM DE UMA ÉPOCA"!
" Somália: Mais um cargueiro tomado de assalto por piratas
Um cargueiro com bandeira de Hong Kong e tripulação estrangeira foi tomado de assalto no Golfo de Ádem, no mesmo dia em que um navio pesqueiro de Kiribati foi abordado na mesma zona, e dias após o assalto a um super-petroleiro saudita… O cargueiro Delight, de bandeira de Hong Kong e com uma tripulação de 25 pessoas de outras nacionalidades, foi sequestrado no Golfo de Ádem, entre a Somália e o Iémen. O navio transportava 36 mil toneladas de trigo para o Irão. Este é o mais recente incidente na região. Também na terça-feira, um navio de pesca do Kiribati, com 12 tripulantes, foi igualmente tomado de assalto pelos piratas. No sábado deu-se o mais grave sequestro das últimas semanas. O Sirius Star, um super-petroleiro com 332 metros de comprimento, foi desviado na costa do Quénia, a sul da Somália. O navio transportava dois milhões de barris de petróleo, avaliados em mais de 100 milhões de dólares, e está agora ancorado ao largo da Somália. No petroleiro encontram-se vários piratas e 25 tripulantes de várias nacionalidades, incluindo 19 filipinos, dois britânicos, dois polacos, um croata e um saudita. A Arábia Saudita considerou o ataque ao Sirius Star «um acto revoltante» e apelou a uma acção internacional coordenada contra a pirataria marítima. O Sirius Star é o maior navio de sempre a ser sequestrado, confirmam as agências noticiosas internacionais. Neste momento há já centenas de tripulantes de navios raptados na Somália, com as mais variadas nacionalidades. Segundo a BBC, os tripulantes são normalmente bem tratados pelos raptores, e acabam por ser libertados depois dos armadores pagarem resgates milionários."
FIM DA GLOBALIZAÇÃO
Há anos, portanto, que só não vê quem não quer ver… Os tais que são os piores cegos! Ou ainda quem, em vez de olhar e ver a realidade, anda enfronhado em leituras já atrasadas (dada a velocidade das mudanças) e ignora, portanto, o que se está já a passar à sua volta.
Tinha muita graça essa coisa de ver uma série de gente aos saltos e em grande ebulição contra a globalização e seus malefícios quando ela já estava moribunda e a questão era já saber o que viria no pós-globalização e que tipo de coisas íamos sofrer.
A esquerda "verdadeiramente marxista" foi notável neste exercício e até Soares ainda aí fez um pequeno número… Essa "esquerda" provou aí e mais uma vez a radicalidade dos "óculos" de Marx: mostram claramente o que os seus portadores querem ver e ocultam cuidadosamente a realidade! E, ao fazê-lo, esta esquerda "verdadeiramente marxista" conseguia que não fosse notada a realidade da "disruption"… Mas, a outros, ela não passou em branco! E, claro, nem tão pouco as suas consequências… Como bem se nota ao examinar os mapas de Tom Barnett! Mas quem se preocupa com mapas e "disruptions" quando uns "xutos" de ideologia (da pura!) reconfortam muito mais as alminhas…?
No Claro, há largo tempo que aqui tínhamos referido este inexorável fim da globalização e alertado que o que nos interessa mesmo é esta mudança em curso do modelo global, o preço a pagar por isso e como fazer para não figurar no rol dos perdedores mas sim integrar o "centro" do sistema… E, ao fazê-lo, até provocámos um pequeno escândalo, como os leitores regulares ainda estarão lembrados. . Mas é um clássico esta coisa de certas cabeças só perceberem o problema do pau quando levam com ele em plena tola! José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 24, 2008 18:36 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica, inteligência estratégica, mudança do modelo global
Problemas de expressão e... Maminhas! Coisas de Clã... via “Macro”
AS 5 MISSÕES PARA BOND, JAMES BOND By Jerome Chen James Bond is out for revenge in the new film, Quantum of Solace, opening in the José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 24, 2008 17:46 |
link | comments
Tags: perceptions management, inteligência estratégica, mudança do modelo global O POLÍTICO PORTUGÊS E A VAGINA GULOSA... Este “Encontro em Barcelona” podia dar um filme... Por ora, dá uma notícia no “El Mundo”, aqui reproduzida e sem comentários. E nada de perguntar quem é o homem...
José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 21, 2008 01:06 |
link | comments
Tags: humor, espanha, sexo e cidade FORÇAS ARMADAS: INSTITUIÇÃO ÚNICA, AXIAL E IMPRESCINDÍVEL Comemora-se dentro de dias o 33º aniversário do “25 de Novembro”, esse dia em que as Forças Armadas eliminaram ameaças totalitárias ao novo regime e estabilizaram o quadro democrático da República Portuguesa. Uma data importante e muito adequada para lançar uma reflexão séria sobre o papel único e imprescindível das Forças Armadas para Portugal e para a Democracia. E sobre a sua modernização, sobre o que num cenário global novo pode a Defesa fazer de novo e com que novos instrumentos para garantir os velhos objectivos que a República lhe comete. O regime democrático português (face a uma catastrófica crise económica e, consequentemente, social que se perfila para anos) vai ainda sofrer muito a necessidade de umas Forças Armadas sólidas, coesas, inteligentes e disciplinadas. Tem, por isso e no seu próprio interesse, de as cuidar e acarinhar... Em Portugal, a instituição militar é a única que detém larguíssima memória histórica, sentido de serviço público e inteligência estratégica. Nenhuma outra instituição, no nosso país, apresenta uma tal tríade de qualidades próprias. É, por isso, uma instituição axial e estratégica para o futuro de Portugal e não pode como tal estar à mercê de políticos de circunstância e sem dimensão de Estado, suas vendettas e venetas. José Sócrates mostrou já perceber este carácter único da instituição militar e, depois de longos meses de mal-entendidos entre o seu ministro da Defesa e a hierarquia militar, reafirmou o seu entendimento da especificidade do “militar” e explicitou que vê a reforma da Defesa como “um projecto partilhado com as Forças Armadas”. Já o podia ter feito há mais de um ano e assim teria evitado uma crise de confiança que se arrastou durante meses e meses... Mas, enfim, mais vale tarde que nunca e Sócrates acaba por reafirmar a sua vocação de infatigável “bombeiro da República”. SOARES ACORDOU... “A democracia... pode estar em causa” e “a Europa pode deixar de ser um bastião da democracia”. Duas afirmações de Mário Soares em crónica no DN de 18 Novembro de 2008. Há dois dias, portanto, e não em 1975... No mesmo dia em que aqui no Claro se avisava para certos equívocos actuais e... fatais! Soares parece ter acordado para uma realidade nova mas bem presente... José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 21, 2008 00:41 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica, portugal, inteligência estratégica, visto de lisboa, defesa, governo DA GUERRA ECONÓMICA O nosso mundo, após a queda do muro e a entrada da China na economia de mercado, tornou-se num local de hipercompetitividade global a que não escapa qualquer estado nem qualquer empresa. Esta situação nova exige a empresas e estados novas capacidades de resposta que, por sua vez, exigem novas abordagens e novos dispositivos de conhecimento. Ter a noção destas realidades e agir em consequência é indispensável a quem queira sobreviver neste novo mundo hipercompetitivo. Desde o programa Clinton de 1994 que a resposta adequada a estas novas necessidades tem vindo a ser desenvolvida com a Inteligência Competitiva, seus dispositivos específicos e suas metodologias inovadoras, com o objectivo de antecipar e de modelar a realidade. Para sobreviver na guerra económica global, é disto que temos de tratar e de nos ocupar. Antes que outros se ocupem de nós… A crise global, o regresso do Estado-nação (e da geopolítica) que ela está a induzir e a emergência de um novo modelo da economia global agudizam a guerra económica e tornam a questão ainda mais premente. José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 21, 2008 00:02 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica, curvas da economia, inteligência estratégica, mudança do modelo global Já sabe em quem vai votar?
EL CONDOR PASA, NO CLARO YMA SUMAC, COM SAUDADE O EX-KGB NO COMANDO Bruscamente no verão passado, em Moscovo, os ex-KBG saíram da sombra e mostram-se na linha da frente. Se até à guerra da Geórgia, durante o verão, os ex-KGB manobravam nos bastidores (embora tivessem colocado o seu major Putine à frente do estado), depois da guerra passaram mesmo para a linha da frente, dominam as grandes empresas (Rosneft, Rosoboronexport...), os sectores estratégicos do armamento e da energia, os “assuntos internos”, os media e até, como nota Vincent Jauvert, do “Nouvel Observateur”, a política externa e a diplomacia. Les ‘ex’ du KGB à la manoeuvre Depuis la guerre en Géorgie, les faucons du régime Poutine sont à la manoeuvre. Leur chef s'appelle Igor Setchine. Cet ancien du KGB est à la fois vice- Premier ministre et patron de la première entreprise pétrolière du pays, Rosneft. Depuis le mois d'août, il tente d'organiser un front anti-Washington en Amérique latine, où il s'est rendu à deux reprises. A Cuba, il a déclaré qu'il fallait réactiver les «relations traditionnelles» entre Moscou et Au Venezuela, il a assisté aux vols d'entraînement de deux bombardiers stratégiques russes, dépêchés la veille de Russie. Ensuite, il s'est rendu au Nicaragua, seul pays, outre En l'accueillant, le président du pays, l'ex-révolutionnaire sandiniste Ortega, a déclaré que la lumière de Moscou «éclairait toujours le monde». Il y a plus sérieux. La même semaine, un autre «faucon» a fait une annonce d'une portée géostratégique potentiellement considérable, et cela sans être démenti par le Kremlin. L'homme en question est Anatoli Issaïkine, ancien du KGB, lui aussi, et patron de la gigantesque société publique russe de ventes d'armes Rosoboronexport. Le 17 septembre, il a révélé qu'il était en train de négocier avec Téhéran la vente du système de défense anti-aérienne le plus sophistiqué de l'arsenal russe, des batteries qui protégeraient les sites nucléaires iraniens contre une éventuelle attaque israélienne ou américaine. Si elle avait effectivement lieu, une telle livraison serait une attaque frontale contre les Etats-Unis et leurs alliés, sans précédent depuis la fin de la guerre froide. Vincent Jauvert Le Nouvel Observateur
"Agitação Laboral" Preocupa China Pequim, 20 Nov (Lusa) - O ministro dos Recursos Humanos e Segurança Social chinês, Yin Weimin, assumiu hoje a agitação laboral como a sua "primeira preocupação" e alertou que a crise financeira global poderá agravar a "crítica" situação do emprego. Nota Claro: Dentro de poucos meses, ver-se-à como os BRIC têm frágeis pés de barro... E como terão enormes dificuldades em adaptar-se ao emergente modelo global!
José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 20, 2008 19:48 |
link | comments
Tags: china, mudança do modelo global 33 Anos depois começa a saber-se COMO FOI O "25 DE NOVEMBRO" O general Pires Veloso, em entrevista ao CM, diz que no “25 de Novembro” de 1975 (o golpe militar que estabeleceu a Democracia que temos, "Ramalho Eanes não fez nada”. O comandante da Região Militar do Norte, de 1975 e 1976, vai publicar as memórias dos meses de brasa que se seguiram ao 25 de Abril. O livro deverá ser lançado no próximo dia 25 de Novembro. A data certa, claro!
Caso BPN: Oliveira e Costa detido O ex-presidente do Banco Português de Negócios (BPN) foi detido hoje e constituído arguido pelo Departamento Central de Investigação e Acção Penal (DCIAP) por crimes de burla e branqueamento de capitais. A Procuradoria considerou existirem indícios suficientes da prática dos crimes de burla e branqueamento na ex-administração do BPN, liderada por Oliveira e Costa. Este responsável deverá ainda hoje ser presente ao juiz do Tirbunal de Instrução Criminal (TIC). Entretanto, o Procurador Geral da República (PGR) escreveu aos diversos grupos parlamentares oferecendo-se para... continua Aqui no CM Nota do Claro: Terá o aparelho judiciário (e as polícias) a coragem e a inteligência necessárias para desmantelar esse verdadeiro polvo do "complexo salazarento e neo-corporativo"...? Se tiver, saiu a sorte grande a Portugal... O QUE DIZ MENEZES...?! José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 20, 2008 18:12 |
link | comments
Tags: portugal, complexo salazarento e neo-corpo, visto de esquerda, insegurança, psd, corrupção DAR A VOLTA À CRISE "Queremos fazer da crise uma oportunidade para o desenvolvimento" disse hoje Sarkozy, ao anunciar o lançamento de um “fundo soberano à francesa”, para apoiar as empresas estratégicas francesas que caiam em dificuldades face à crise ou fiquem susceptíveis de passar sob o controlo de grupos estrangeiros. "Já que os bancos estão friorentos e não investem, nós financiaremos", disse Sarkozy para explicar que lança "uma política pragmática". . Depois do fracasso do G20, ficou claro que a resposta à crise global será feita pelos estados não de modo concertado mas na base do “cada um por si”. Sarkozy, como é hábito, não perdeu tempo e anunciou este “fundo estratégico de investimento”, como a arma francesa anti-crise, dotado de 20 mil milhões de euros. A resposta à crise reabilita assim o Estado-nação, de que muita gente, num manifesto exagero, havia anunciado a morte, já há anos. E com o Estado-nação regressa, aos comandos e em força, a geopolítica... E com esta reafirmam-se as necessidades de estratégia e da sua (prévia) inteligência! A mudança do modelo global, é claro, está mesmo em marcha e já fez o seu take-off... Ver a notícia Aqui .
INTERVIEW José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 20, 2008 17:27 |
link | comments
Tags: europa, inteligência económica, inteligência estratégica, mudança do modelo global A nuvem de títulos, de hoje, mostra bem como A grande crise global já contaminou Portugal... O Banco Privado Português (BPP), que opera no negócio do ‘private banking’, pediu um aval ao Estado de 750 milhões de euros de forma a combater as dificuldades que o sistema financeiro atravessa. O (...) Calotes sobem para os oito mil milhões A actual crise está a ter "um efeito severo sobre a Banca". As instituições estão a sofrer um (...) A Livraria Byblos, a maior do país, encerrou esta quinta-feira as suas portas ao público, tendo apresentado um processo de (...) . Famílias devem 2 anos de salários Crédito malparado vai duplicar até 2009 Imobiliário: Crise internacional adia recuperação do sector em Portugal - estudo consultora Crise arrasa com indústria automóvel . Sócrates defende investimento público José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 20, 2008 16:33 |
link | comments
Tags: media, curvas da economia, visto de lisboa, mudança do modelo global
QUEM SÃO OS ACCIONISTAS DA BANQUETA DE RENDEIRO...? Sim, quem são os que querem agora que o Estado lhes 750 milhões do dinheiro dos contribuintes para tapar os buracos do que têm andado a fazer, quem são eles...? Sabendo quem eles são, vai-se perceber a razão pela qual nos arriscamos a ficar sem esses 750 milhões ou algo lá perto... Se o governo de Sócrates cede a isto, deixamos de saber onde acabarão as cedências e todo o Portugal não chegará para pagar a esta gentinha e outra da mesma espécie. Mistérios do "complexo neo-corporativo e salazarento"... Claro! José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 20, 2008 13:45 |
link | comments
Tags: inteligência económica, portugal, complexo salazarento e neo-corpo, visto de esquerda, mudança do modelo global, governo "SUSPENDER A DEMOCRACIA..." A gaffe parva de Manuela Ferreira Leite A senhora nem é má senhora, não tem é jeito nenhum para a coisa. Não tem réstea do que se chama inteligência política... E tem uma comunicação absolutamente "tipo serra"! Semelhante a esta, só a que o "comunicador" pôs Mário Lino a vomitar sobre o "deserto" com o "jamais"... Lino que também não é má pessoa! A gaffe de MFL é tanto mais parva (senão mesmo estúpida) quanto ela devia saber que se alguma vez a democracia fôr suspensa não será com ela, nem ela será admitida no tabuleiro desse jogo... a não ser como peça comida! E também deveria saber que ao falar como falou, o que ela estava a fazer, para a grande opinião pública, era apenas o elogia do voluntarismo e coragem de Sócrates... Que lhe devia enviar um ramo de rosas vermelhas, em jeito de agradecimento! José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 19, 2008 14:12 |
link | comments
Tags: media, perceptions management, psd ESTÁ O ESTADO EM CO-GESTÃO...? Depois de ouvir, nos últimos dias, uma catadupa de declarações dos sindicatos dos professores, surgem-me duas grandes dúvidas:
Claro que, por mim, quero declarar que não votei, nas eleições legislativas, Parece-me, porém, que com esta confusão, com esta vontade sindical de uma “co-gestão” do Estado, alguém se está a enganar muito. E não é de um ponto de vista teórico, pois nisso não há teoria alguma mas apenas uma amálgama lançada por estes sindicalistas que parecem querer gerir o Estado em parceria com o governo. Se os sindicatos, na velha tradição comunista, entraram em campanha contra uma vitória do PS nas próximas eleições, se querem impedir uma nova vitória socialista daqui a uns meses, e se Mário Nogueira está em campanha para se alcandorar a patrão da Inter, no lugar do “mole” Carvalho da Silva, é preciso dizer que não se aperceberam que já desapareceu o quadro em que, tradicionalmente, tais manobras tinham a sua racionalidade própria, embora bizarra. E é aí que radica o engano deles. O quadro em que, desde o fim dos anos setenta, foi possível aos comunistas fazer uma aliança negativa com o PSD (e com vantagens para ambas as partes...), sempre em oposição ao PS, desapareceu. Desapareceram, com a crise global, os fundamentos e parâmetros económicos desse quadro (e em 2009 já vão ter umas aulas práticas sobre esta matéria...) e desapareceu mesmo a paisagem partidária e, obviamente, os seus equilíbrios. O PSD (desde que não consegue passar os 30% nas intenções de voto) é cada vez menos o parceiro que os comunistas precisam (e tinham...) para esta aliança negativa. Em contrapartida, em Belém está um presidente que, ao contrário dos anteriores presidentes, sabe e é capaz de ter a sua própria agenda de poder... Sugiro aos sindicalistas e ao CC do PC que analisem bem e meditem o sibilino aviso de Cavaco sobre o “direito à manifestação”. E, apesar das suas já antigas referências a Kautsky e Bernstein, não registo qualquer manifestação de simpatia do Presidente Cavaco sobre a co-gestão... Ainda antes do fim de 2009, se verá! . Última nota: não deixa de ser interessante (para a análise...) que comunistas e sindicalistas apenas tenham encontrado como "massas", para lançar contra o governo e o PS, os professores e não quaisquer "proletários" de alguma "cintura vermelha" ou "camponeses pobres" de "zonas libertadas". . Os professores são uma profissão protegida, têm um estatuto de protegidos e não estão sujeitos às leis normais de trabalho que só se aplicam aos paisanos da "privada" e não aos protegidos do estatuto da função pública... uma espécie de "fidalguia" face aos comuns mortais sujeitos às oscilações do mercado e ao código de trabalho. José Mateus Cavaco Silva at November 18, 2008 19:31 |
link | comments
Tags: portugal, complexo salazarento e neo-corpo, visto de esquerda, governo G20, crise e estabilidade: “CADA UM QUE RESOLVA OS SEUS PROBLEMAS...” Para a Stratfor e depois da reunião de Washington do G20, “the geopolitical problem confronting the world at the moment is that it has been forced to offer massive support to the global financial system with sovereign wealth (…) A wave of massive business failures on top of the financial crisis might well move the global system to a very different place. Therefore, each nation, by itself and indifferent to others, is in the process of figuring out how to postpone these failures to a more opportune time — or to never. (…) And the last thing any one cared about was the G-20 concept for the future of the economic system.” On G-20 and GM: Economics, Politics and Social Stability
By George Friedman November 17, 2008 Related Special Topic Pages . · Political Economy and the Financial Crisis The G-20 met last Saturday. Afterward, the group issued a meaningless statement and decided to meet again in March 2009, or perhaps later. Clearly, the urgency of October is gone. First, the perception of imminent collapse is past. Politicians are superb seismographs for detecting impending disaster, and these politicians did not act as if they were running out of time. Second, the Given the sense in Europe that this financial crisis marked the end of The crisis has receded sufficiently that nothing more needs to be done immediately beyond “cooperation,” and nothing can be done until the From Financial Crisis to Cyclical Recession
The financial crisis has been mitigated, if not solved. The problem now is that we are in a cyclical recession, and that every country is trying to figure out how to cope with the recession. Unlike the past two recessions, this one is more global than local. But unlike the 1970s, when recession was global, this one is not accompanied by soaring inflation and interest rates. All recessions have different dynamics, but all have one thing in common: They impose punishment and discipline on economies run wild. This is happening around the world. If the world were all about economics, culling is what the Chinese would do. But the world is more complex than that. A culling would lead to massive unemployment. Many Chinese employees live on Economic Restructuring vs. Stability
The Chinese have therefore prepared a massive stimulus package that is more of a development program to make up for declining This is not only a Chinese problem. Wherever there is an economic downturn, politicians must decide whether society — and their own political futures — can withstand the rigors recessions impose. Recessions occur when, as is inevitable, inefficiencies and irrationalities build up in the financial and economic system. The resulting economic downturn imposes a harsh discipline that destroys the inefficient, encourages everyone to become more efficient, and opens the doors to new businesses using new technologies and business models. The year 2001 smashed the technology sector in the The business cycle works well, but the human costs can be daunting. The collapse of inefficient businesses leaves workers without jobs, investors without money and society less stable than before. The pain needed to rectify Every country in the world is looking inward at the impact of the recession on its economy and measuring its resources. Countries are deciding whether they have the ability to prop up business that should fail, what the social consequences of business failure would be, and whether they should try to use their resources to avoid the immediate pain of recession. This is why the G-20 ended in meaningless platitudes. Each country is also trying to answer the question of how much pain it — and its regime — can endure. The more pain imposed, the healthier countries will emerge economically — unless of course the pain kills them. Ultimately, the rationality of economics and the reality of society frequently diverge. Recession and the
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wall Street s'enfonce, le marché craint le pire pour l'emploi
|
Le pétrole continue sa chute à New York et lorgne les 60 dollars
|
Ex-Chantiers de l'Atlantique: l'Etat va acquérir 33,34% du capital
|
Les marchés replongent malgré une baisse des taux en Europe
|
USA: la crise impose à Obama un choix crucial pour le secrétaire au Trésor
|
La Banque d'Angleterre sort l'artillerie lourde contre la récession
|
La Bourse de Paris a lâché 6,38%, la morosité économique reprend le dessus
|
Le FMI annonce pour 2009 la 1ere récession dans les pays riches depuis 1945
|
La crise économique éclipse l'effet Obama, les marchés dégringolent
|
Airbus a enregistré 71 annulations de commandes en octobre
|
OBAMA: COMO SAIR DA CRISE?
Obama herda a pior situação económica desde a crise de 1929. Um défice orçamental de 500 mil milhões, taxa de desemprego crescente e uma economia já entrada em recessão (com a pergunta a ser se passará à depressão...). Face a este cenário negro, que se propõe Obama fazer? O L’Express dá algumas pistas...
Des grands travaux pour relancer l'emploi
Barack Obama entend débloquer 50 milliards de dollars pour de grands travaux d'infrastructures (routes, ponts, système éducatif).

Il a promis par ailleurs un crédit d'impôt de 3.000 dollars pour chaque emploi créé aux Etats-Unis dans les deux ans à venir.
Il veut éliminer la taxation sur le capital pour les start-up et petites entreprises créatrices d'emploi. Il a également parlé de supprimer les réductions d'impôts pour les sociétés qui délocalisent.
Enfin, il a plaidé pour un deuxième plan de relance économique de 60 milliards de dollars, sans plus de précisions.
A long terme, il compte lancer un plan de 150 milliards de dollars sur dix ans pour favoriser les énergies renouvelables, ce qui pourra créer cinq millions d'emplois "bien payés et qui ne seront jamais délocalisés".
Continua Aqui
OBAMA OU A REABILITAÇÃO
E O TRIUNFO DA RETÓRICA...
Não sei, claro, quem engendrou a candidatura de Obama, quem inventou e desenvolveu, nos últimos três ou quatro anos, aquela quase perfeita e sem falhas “agenda Obama” (se Robert Ludlum não tivesse já falecido, até se poderia pensar numa das suas astutas e implacáveis novelas de suspense...), mas de uma coisa não tenho dúvidas: Obama é a mais perfeita operação de perception’s management montada desde há muitos anos... Obama é a mais rápida, mais eficaz e mais barata das formas de recuperar a reputação americana, de refazer a, até ontem desgraçada, reputação dos EUA. Ou seja, Obama dá à América uma nova virgindade.
Se alguém não conhecia nem entendia o conceito de softpower, agora ele entrou-lhe pela casa dentro... Única dúvida: a “agenda Obama”, que vem de 2005, é anterior à implosão geoeconómica do “15 de Setembro” (de 2008) e, portanto, anterior à nova conjuntura estratégica global. É de um tempo em que a recuperação da reputação americana era a grande prioridade, um tempo marcado, portanto, pelas necessidades e características próprias do softpower... Ora, com o “15 de Setembro”, entrámos numa nova conjuntura marcada por outras necessidades e outras características. Uma conjuntura que indicia ir colocar fortes problemas de hardpower. Neste novo cenário, claro, John McCain seria o homem próprio da conjuntura, tal como Obama era o da anterior... Será que, dada a vertigem dos tempos, os americanos elegeram, para os próximos quatro anos, o homem da conjuntura anterior? Seria de uma grande ironia... Mas Obama, que surpreendeu tudo até agora, pode também surpreender como homem de hardpower...
A Stratfor analisa, entretanto, os desafios que se colocam ao novo presidente americano.
Barack Obama has been elected president of the United States by a large majority in the Electoral College. The Democrats have dramatically increased their control of Congress, increasing the number of seats they hold in the House of Representatives and moving close to the point where — with a few Republican defections — they can have veto-proof control of the Senate. Given the age of some Supreme Court justices, Obama might well have the opportunity to appoint at least one and possibly two new justices. He will begin as one of the most powerful presidents in a long while. Truly extraordinary were the celebrations held around the world upon Obama’s victory. They affirm the global expectations Obama has raised — and reveal that the United States must be more important to Europeans than the latter like to admit. (We can’t imagine late-night vigils in the United States over a French election.)
Obama is an extraordinary rhetorician, and as Aristotle pointed out, rhetoric is one of the foundations of political power. Rhetoric has raised him to the presidency, along with the tremendous unpopularity of his predecessor and a financial crisis that took a tied campaign and gave Obama a lead he carefully nurtured to victory. So, as with all politicians, his victory was a matter of rhetoric and, according to Machiavelli, luck. Obama had both, but now the question is whether he has Machiavelli’s virtue in full by possessing the ability to exercise power. This last element is what governing is about, and it is what will determine if his presidency succeeds.
Embedded in his tremendous victory is a single weakness: Obama won the popular vote by a fairly narrow margin, about 52 percent of the vote. That means that almost as many people voted against him as voted for him.
U.S. President George W. Bush demonstrated that the inability to understand the uses and limits of power can crush a presidency very quickly. The enormous enthusiasm of Obama’s followers could conceal how he — like Bush — is governing a deeply, and nearly evenly, divided country. Obama’s first test will be simple: Can he maintain the devotion of his followers while increasing his political base? Or will he believe, as Bush and Cheney did, that he can govern without concern for the other half of the country because he controls the presidency and Congress, as Bush and Cheney did in 2001? Presidents are elected by electoral votes, but they govern through public support.
Obama and his supporters will say there is no danger of a repeat of Bush — who believed he could carry out his agenda and build his political base at the same time, but couldn’t. Building a political base requires modifying one’s agenda. But when you start modifying your agenda, when you become pragmatic, you start to lose your supporters. If Obama had won with 60 percent of the popular vote, this would not be as pressing a question. But he barely won by more than Bush in 2004. Now, we will find out if Obama is as skillful a president as he was a candidate.
Obama will soon face the problem of beginning to disappoint people all over the world, a problem built into his job. The first disappointments will be minor. There are thousands of people hoping for appointments, some to Cabinet positions, others to the White House, others to federal agencies. Many will get something, but few will get as much as they hoped for. Some will feel betrayed and become bitter. During the transition process, the disappointed office seeker — an institution in American politics — will start leaking on background to whatever reporters are available. This will strike a small, discordant note; creating no serious problems, but serving as a harbinger of things to come.
Later, Obama will be sworn in. He will give a memorable, perhaps historic speech at his inauguration. There will be great expectations about him in the country and around the world. He will enjoy the traditional presidential honeymoon, during which all but his bitterest enemies will give him the benefit of the doubt. The press initially will adore him, but will begin writing stories about all the positions he hasn’t filled, the mistakes he made in the vetting process and so on. And then, sometime in March or April, things will get interesting.
Obama has promised to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq, where he does not intend to leave any residual force. If he follows that course, he will open the door for the Iranians. Iran’s primary national security interest is containing or dominating Iraq, with which Iran fought a long war. If the United States remains in Iraq, the Iranians will be forced to accept a neutral government in Iraq. A U.S. withdrawal will pave the way for the Iranians to use Iraqi proxies to create, at a minimum, an Iraqi government more heavily influenced by Iran.
Apart from upsetting Sunni and Kurdish allies of the United States in Iraq, the Iranian ascendancy in Iraq will disturb some major American allies — particularly the Saudis, who fear Iranian power. The United States can’t afford a scenario under which Iranian power is projected into the Saudi oil fields. While that might be an unlikely scenario, it carries catastrophic consequences. The Jordanians and possibly the Turks, also American allies, will pressure Obama not simply to withdraw. And, of course, the Israelis will want the United States to remain in place to block Iranian expansion. Resisting a coalition of Saudis and Israelis will not be easy.
This will be the point where Obama’s pledge to talk to the Iranians will become crucial. If he simply withdraws from Iraq without a solid understanding with Iran, the entire American coalition in the region will come apart. Obama has pledged to build coalitions, something that will be difficult in the Middle East if he withdraws from Iraq without ironclad Iranian guarantees. He therefore will talk to the Iranians. But what can Obama offer the Iranians that would induce them to forego their primary national security interest? It is difficult to imagine a U.S.-Iranian deal that is both mutually beneficial and enforceable.
Obama will then be forced to make a decision. He can withdraw from Iraq and suffer the geopolitical consequences while coming under fire from the substantial political right in the United States that he needs at least in part to bring into his coalition. Or, he can retain some force in Iraq, thereby disappointing his supporters. If he is clumsy, he could wind up under attack from the right for negotiating with the Iranians and from his own supporters for not withdrawing all U.S. forces from Iraq. His skills in foreign policy and domestic politics will be tested on this core question, and he undoubtedly will disappoint many.
Obama will need to address Afghanistan next. He has said that this is the real war, and that he will ask U.S. allies to join him in the effort. This means he will go to the Europeans and NATO, as he has said he will do. The Europeans are delighted with Obama’s victory because they feel Obama will consult them and stop making demands of them. But demands are precisely what he will bring the Europeans. In particular, he will want the Europeans to provide more forces for Afghanistan.
Many European countries will be inclined to provide some support, if for no other reason than to show that they are prepared to work with Obama. But European public opinion is not about to support a major deployment in Afghanistan, and the Europeans don’t have the force to deploy there anyway. In fact, as the global financial crisis begins to have a more dire impact in Europe than in the United States, many European countries are actively reducing their deployments in Afghanistan to save money. Expanding operations is the last thing on European minds.
Obama’s Afghan solution of building a coalition centered on the Europeans will thus meet a divided Europe with little inclination to send troops and with few troops to send in any event. That will force him into a confrontation with the Europeans in spring 2009, and then into a decision. The United States and its allies collectively lack the force to stabilize Afghanistan and defeat the Taliban. They certainly lack the force to make a significant move into Pakistan — something Obama has floated on several occasions that might be a good idea if force were in fact available.
He will have to make a hard decision on Afghanistan. Obama can continue the war as it is currently being fought, without hope of anything but a long holding action, but this risks defining his presidency around a hopeless war. He can choose to withdraw, in effect reinstating the Taliban, going back on his commitment and drawing heavy fire from the right. Or he can do what we have suggested is the inevitable outcome, namely, negotiate — and reach a political accord — with the Taliban. Unlike Bush, however, withdrawal or negotiation with the Taliban will increase the pressure on Obama from the right. And if this is coupled with a decision to delay withdrawal from Iraq, Obama’s own supporters will become restive. His 52 percent Election Day support could deteriorate with remarkable speed.
At the same time, Obama will face the Russian question. The morning after Obama’s election, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev announced that Russia was deploying missiles in its European exclave of Kaliningrad in response to the U.S. deployment of ballistic missile defense systems in Poland. Obama opposed the Russians on their August intervention in Georgia, but he has never enunciated a clear Russia policy. We expect Ukraine will have shifted its political alignment toward Russia, and Moscow will be rapidly moving to create a sphere of influence before Obama can bring his attention — and U.S. power — to bear.
Obama will again turn to the Europeans to create a coalition to resist the Russians. But the Europeans will again be divided. The Germans can’t afford to alienate the Russians because of German energy dependence on Russia and because Germany does not want to fight another Cold War. The British and French may be more inclined to address the question, but certainly not to the point of resurrecting NATO as a major military force. The Russians will be prepared to talk, and will want to talk a great deal, all the while pursuing their own national interest of increasing their power in what they call their “near abroad.”
Obama will have many options on domestic policy given his majorities in Congress. But his Achilles’ heel, as it was for Bush and for many presidents, will be foreign policy. He has made what appear to be three guarantees. First, he will withdraw from Iraq. Second, he will focus on Afghanistan. Third, he will oppose Russian expansionism. To deliver on the first promise, he must deal with the Iranians. To deliver on the second, he must deal with the Taliban. To deliver on the third, he must deal with the Europeans.
The Europeans will pose another critical problem, as they want a second Bretton Woods agreement. Some European states appear to desire a set of international regulations for the financial system. There are three problems with this.
First, unless Obama wants to change course dramatically, the U.S. and European positions differ over the degree to which governments will regulate interbank transactions. The Europeans want much more intrusion than the Americans. They are far less averse to direct government controls than the Americans have been. Obama has the power to shift American policy, but doing that will make it harder to expand his base.
Second, the creation of an international regulatory body that has authority over American banks would create a system where U.S. financial management was subordinated to European financial management.
And third, the Europeans themselves have no common understanding of things. Obama could thus quickly be drawn into complex EU policy issues that could tie his hands in the United States. These could quickly turn into painful negotiations, in which Obama’s allure to the Europeans will evaporate.
One of the foundations of Obama’s foreign policy — and one of the reasons the Europeans have celebrated his election — was the perception that Obama is prepared to work closely with the Europeans. He is in fact prepared to do so, but his problem will be the same one Bush had: The Europeans are in no position to give the things that Obama will need from them — namely, troops, a revived NATO to confront the Russians and a global financial system that doesn’t subordinate American financial authority to an international bureaucracy.
Like any politician, Obama will face the challenge of having made a set of promises that are not mutually supportive. Much of his challenge boils down to problems that he needs to solve and that he wants European help on, but the Europeans are not prepared to provide the type and amount of help he needs. This, plus the fact that a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq requires an agreement with Iran — something hard to imagine without a continued U.S. presence in Iraq — gives Obama a difficult road to move on.
As with all American presidents (who face midterm elections with astonishing speed), Obama’s foreign policy moves will be framed by his political support. Institutionally, he will be powerful. In terms of popular support, he begins knowing that almost half the country voted against him, and that he must increase his base. He must exploit the honeymoon period, when his support will expand, to bring another 5 percent or 10 percent of the public into his coalition. These people voted against him; now he needs to convince them to support him. But these are precisely the people who would regard talks with the Taliban or Iran with deep distrust. And if negotiations with the Iranians cause him to keep forces in Iraq, he will alienate his base without necessarily winning over his opponents.
And there is always the unknown. There could be a terrorist attack, the Russians could start pressuring the Baltic states, the Mexican situation could deteriorate. The unknown by definition cannot be anticipated. And many foreign leaders know it takes an administration months to settle in, something some will try to take advantage of. On top of that, there is now nearly a three-month window in which the old president is not yet out and the new president not yet in.
Obama must deal with extraordinarily difficult foreign policy issues in the context of an alliance failing not because of rough behavior among friends but because the allies’ interests have diverged. He must deal with this in the context of foreign policy positions difficult to sustain and reconcile, all against the backdrop of almost half an electorate that voted against him versus supporters who have enormous hopes vested in him. Obama knows all of this, of course, as he indicated in his victory speech.
We will now find out if Obama understands the exercise of political power as well as he understands the pursuit of that power. You really can’t know that until after the fact. There is no reason to think he can’t finesse these problems. Doing so will take cunning, trickery and the ability to make his supporters forget the promises he made while keeping their support. It will also require the ability to make some of his opponents embrace him despite the path he will have to take. In other words, he will have to be cunning and ruthless without appearing to be cunning and ruthless. That’s what successful presidents do.
In the meantime, he should enjoy the transition. It’s frequently the best part of a presidency.
E A ECONOMIA NO 'DAY AFTER'....?
Wall Street chute, la réalité économique rattrape l'élection
|
Etats-Unis: la situation de l'emploi donne une mesure du défi qui attend Obama
|
Refonte du système financier et libre-échange: deux défis pour Obama
|
Crise financière: Obama et les démocrates attendus au tournant
|
Le dollar en hausse face à l'euro après la désignation de Barack Obama
|
VIOLAÇÕES E OUTRAS SELVAJARIAS
Há coisas que dão realmente volta ao estômago e que é impossível calar. Há selvajarias que nada justifica. Como esta, preparada com todo o cuidado como mostra o facto de "cameras were banned from the public stoning". Só um 'detalhe' mais: a sacrificada tinha 13 anos...
“Nothing could be a more stark reminder than the story of the young Somali woman who was stoned to death for adultery after reporting to authorities that she had been raped.
Amnesty International reported that partway through the stoning nurses checked whether Aisha was still alive. They pulled her body out of the ground to ascertain she was still breathing before the stoning continued.
A Unicef statement said: ‘She sought protection from the authorities, who then accused her of adultery and sentenced her to death. ‘A child was victimised twice – first by the perpetrators of the rape and then by those responsible for administering justice’… “ in Douglas Farah
An armed soldier guards a crowd in Kismayo, Somalia, which is currently ruled by an Islamist militia (file picture). Amnesty International has said that a 13-year-old girl, who had been raped, was stoned to death there
O GRANDE BUSINESS DE BOND
A coisa nem é muito secreta mas é bem eficaz, funciona muito bem e alcança e ultrapassa mesmo os objectivos... E com muito charme. Bond, James Bond, é uma das melhores máquinas de marketing e comunicação jamais inventadas, como bem mostram estes 'files' do agente secreto de Sua Majestade A Gestão das Percepções que o Claro divulga:

Son personnage séduit les spectateurs et son image attire les partenaires. L'agent secret le plus célèbre du monde est une véritable machine à cash pour ses créateurs. Les fans se ruent dans les cinémas à chaque épisode, les entreprises se pressent pour y placer leur marque et les produits dérivés sont toujours plus nombreux. Sans conteste, James Bond fait vendre. A l'occasion de la sortie le 31 octobre du prochain opus, "Quantum of solace", découvrez qui profite de la manne 007. Lire
Barack Abana a América e em Todo o Mundo a Barraca Obama Bien sûr, la nuit fut historique. L'Amérique avait besoin de retrouver confiance par une action extraordinaire qui est aussi une condition de la restauration de son leadership mondial. Elle avait besoin de tourner radicalement la page "W". Pour cela, l'élection d'Obama est un symbole d'une portée incomparable et l'on ne peut que s'en réjouir. A l'annonce des résultats, en Arizona John McCain a prononcé un discours remarquable qui a conforté le message central d'Obama, celle de l'unité et du rassemblement de tous les Américains. Espoir et changement, c'est un peu Kennedy et Reagan à la fois. Na AFP: Election d'Obama: les déclarations d'une journée historiquePrésident Obama

Il convient cependant de noter qu'au vote populaire, si la victoire est très nette, et malgré une participation très élevée, on ne peut parler de raz-de-marée. C'est évidemment le cas pour les grands électeurs avec 350 voix, mais l'Amérique reste à peu près divisée en deux. Sans refaire l'élection, la crise a beaucoup servi cette victoire démocrate. Sans elle, McCain pourrait aujourd'hui être le successeur d'un président républicain... Il est vrai qu'au-delà de la crise, le rejet de Bush et de républicains est tel que le poids à porter était spécialement lourd. En quelque sorte, la crise a fait le reste.
Quant à l'avenir? Obama dirigera comme McCain en avait aussi eu la volonté, sans esprit de parti. Des républicains modérés au gouvernement? Très probablement, y compris le maintien possible de Gates à la Défense.
Face au Congrès démocrate, il faudra aussi composer, comme le veut le système de la séparation des pouvoirs. Outre les contraintes budgétaires, les desiderata de courants ou de personnalités démocrates au Congrès devront donc être ménagées. Il est peu probable qu'Obama puisse avoir les moyens de recréer le lien social américain comme il le souhaite en revigorant la classe moyenne. Sa marge de manoeuvre sera serrée.
Quant au plan international, aucune option ne sera écartée. L'Europe n'est pas une prorité et si les Européens ne se montrent pas des partenaires crédibles, l'Amérique n'hésitera pas à suivre sa route seule. Se rappeler Bill Clinton...
Avec plus de distance, il faut se ranger à l'idée que l'Amérique est capable d'extraordinaires rebondissements. J'ai parlé de réinvention américaine. Avec cette élection, l'Amérique se réinvente, balayant d'un coup le lourd passif laissé par "W" pour son image dans le monde. Ira-t-elle au bout de cette réinvention par la refondation d'un contrat social comme les Roosevelt surent le proposer? Nous avons quatre ans pour voir.La victoire de Barack Obama n'est pas un raz-de-marée
-
Certains ont cru jusqu’à la dernière minute à une victoire à l’arraché de John McCain, mais finalement Barack Obama décroche une victoire assez tranchée. Comment l’expliquez-vous ?
- On peut parler d’une victoire nette, mais ce n’est pas un raz-de-marée. Sur le plan des grands électeurs, c’est un succès. Mais sur le plan national, cela représente 52 % des voix. Sans la crise économique, McCain aurait eu plus de chances de l’emporter.
- Peut-on quand même dire que Barack Obama aura les mains libres pour gouverner?
- Le Congrès ne sera pas à sa botte. Traditionnellement, il reste indépendant du Président. Les républicains sont plus habitués à manœuvrer, Obama devra faire preuve de la même dextérité avec la majorité démocrate. Sa volonté de changement sera aussi confrontée à la rigueur budgétaire. Et s’il bénéficie d’un capital politique important, sur le plan militaire par exemple, sa marge de manœuvre sera limitée.
- Que va changer son élection sur le plan international?
- Au départ, il va privilégier des objectifs réalistes de coopération et la diplomatie pour rétablir la crédibilité des États-Unis dans le monde. Mais il n’hésitera pas à mener sa politique seule, s’il n’y a pas d’alternative. Il pourrait aussi faire usage de la force, s’il l’estime nécessaire, comme au Pakistan.
Concernant la Russie, son discours est plus prometteur que celui du ticket républicain. Il veut préserver l’Amérique d’une approche de confrontation, contrairement à McCain. D’autant plus que la Russie et les États-Unis se rejoignent sur des sujets tels que l’Iran. Les prémices sont positives, on verra bien ce qu’il en sera.
- Quelle est sa décision la plus attendue?
- La préoccupation majeure des Américains, c’est l’économie. Ces premières actions devraient concerner la fluidité du système de crédits, contenue dans le plan Paulson qu’il soutient. Il ne faut pas non plus oublier qu’il reste encore trois mois d’administration Bush. Par obligation morale et politique, ils vont le tenir au courant, mais ils décident encore.
Interview pour 20minutes.Propos recueillis par Vincent Colas
Sarah Palin refuse d'endosser la responsabilité de la défaite de McCain
Sarah Palin a refusé d'endosser la responsabilité de la défaite de son colistier John McCain face à Barack Obama dans l'élection présidentielle américaine, et appelé les Américains à se rassembler, dans des déclarations diffusées par CNN mercredi. la suite
Bush est à l'heure des dernières grandes décisions
Le président sortant George W. Bush a un peu plus de deux mois pour lancer une réforme du système financier mondial, régler les conditions de la présence militaire américaine en Irak et, qui sait, capturer Oussama Ben Laden. la suite
Les démocrates du Congrès bientôt devant le défi de la crise
Le nouveau Congrès américain et sa majorité démocrate renforcée par les élections, dont les tout derniers résultats étaient toujours attendus mercredi, a déjà un agenda chargé et une priorité absolue: la crise économique. la suite
Obama pourrait être sensible à la tentation protectionniste
L'élection de Barack Obama à la Maison Blanche et le renforcement de la majorité démocrate au Congrès pourraient accroître la tentation protectionniste aux Etats-Unis, surtout au moment où l'économie en récession perd de nombreux emplois. la suite
Le vote Obama: une coalition sans précédent
Le président élu Barack Obama a réussi à rassembler sur son nom une coalition qu'aucun autre candidat démocrate avant lui n'avait réussi à bâtir en recueillant la majorité des suffrages des femmes, des indépendants, des moins de 65 ans et des minorités. la suite
Election Obama: les adversaires des Etats-Unis espèrent aussi un changement
Plusieurs pays qui entretiennent des relations difficiles avec Washington, notamment l'Iran, la Syrie et le Venezuela, ont salué mercredi l'élection du démocrate Barack Obama, en espérant un "changement" dans la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis, et plus de dialogue. la suite
Les Cubains espèrent qu'Obama porte un coup au "plus vieil embargo du monde"
Simples travailleurs cubains, dissidents ou hommes d'affaires américains commerçant avec Cuba, ils ont tous un même espoir, que le nouveau président élu américain Barack Obama en finisse ou du moins assouplisse le "plus vieil embargo du monde" contre l'île communiste. la suite
Election d'Obama: les déclarations d'une journée historique
Après l'élection historique de Barack Obama à la présidence des Etats-Unis voici quelques unes des déclarations les plus fortes recueillies mercredi par l'AFP à travers le monde: la suite
Obama a réinventé la politique américaine
Barack Obama a fait exploser les barrières du racisme, de la logique et des prévisions dans sa quête héroïque de la Maison Blanche, en redéfinissant tant la carte électorale que la forme même d'une élection présidentielle aux Etats-Unis. la suite
Obama à la Maison Blanche: du rêve et une leçon de démocratie pour l'Afrique
La victoire écrasante de Barack Obama, premier afro-américain à entrer à la Maison Blanche, ne changera peut-être pas directement le quotidien concret de l'Afrique, mais elle a suscité mercredi des réactions de fierté de beaucoup de grands responsables du continent noir. la suite
Victoire d'Obama: une élection saluée par la presse mondiale
Les journaux du monde entier ont salué mercredi à l'unisson l'élection "historique" de Barack Obama à la Maison Blanche, estimant qu'elle allait non seulement transformer la face des Etats-Unis mais également la planète. la suite
Obama pourrait attendre quelques mois avant de s'intéresser au Proche-Orient
Le président élu américain Barack Obama, qui a fait de la lutte contre Al-Qaïda en Afghanistan et du retrait d'Irak ses priorités, risque d'attendre quelques mois avant de se pencher sérieusement sur les négociations de paix israélo-palestiniennes, selon les analystes. la suite
Les pays du Moyen-Orient veulent coopérer avec Barack Obama
Hormis l'Iran, toujours silencieux, plusieurs pays du Moyen-Orient ont exprimé mercredi leur volonté de coopérer avec Barack Obama, certains voulant voir dans l'élection du candidat démocrate à la présidence des Etats-Unis l'opportunité d'un changement de cap à Washington. la suite
Brown félicite Obama pour sa victoire et salue ses "valeurs progressistes"
Le Premier ministre britannique Gordon Brown a félicité mercredi Barack Obama pour son élection à la présidence américaine, saluant les "valeurs progressistes et la vision pour l'avenir" de ce "véritable ami du Royaume-Uni". la suite
Victoire d'Obama: l'Amérique latine espère améliorer ses relations avec les Etats-Unis
L'Amérique latine, qui a souvent eu des relations conflictuelles avec les Etats-Unis sous l'ère Bush, s'est félicitée mercredi de l'élection de Barack Obama à la Maison Blanche, en espérant une révision de la politique américaine vis-à-vis de Cuba et du Venezuela. la suite
Portées par l'élection d'Obama, les minorités pressent la France de leur faire plus de place
Fortes de la victoire de Barack Obama, les minorités visibles pressent l'Etat de réinsuffler à "la patrie des droits de l'homme" son énergie originelle en s'ouvrant davantage à la diversité de la société. la suite
Japon: la ville d'Obama en délire après la victoire de son fils adoptif ( contient une vidéo )
La petite ville japonaise d'Obama a fêté mercredi dans la liesse la victoire de son fils adoptif, Barack Obama, en chantant et en dansant la hula, la danse traditionnelle de Hawaï où est né le nouveau président américain. la suite
Les résultats de la présidentielle Etat par Etat
Voici une totalisation des résultats de l'élection présidentielle américaine à partir des estimations diffusées par les télévisions. la suite
Le rôle des "Premières dames" des Etats-Unis
Non rémunéré et ne s'accompagnant d'aucune responsabilité officielle, le rôle de l'épouse du président des Etats-Unis ne connaît pourtant pratiquement aucune limite: la "Première dame" a l'oreille du président et peut exercer une influence sur les décisions politiques. la suite
Les résultats de la présidentielle Etat par Etat
Voici une totalisation des résultats de l'élection présidentielle américaine à partir des estimations diffusées par les télévisions. la suite
En Irak, les soldats américains font pâle figure après l'élection d'Obama
Quand la chaîne CNN annonce mercredi que la Pennsylvanie est attribuée à Barack Obama, un soldat américain lance un "c'est plié" à ses camarades dépités. Autour, des militaires noirs américains sourient mais n'en rajoutent pas. la suite
A Jakarta, l'immense fierté des anciens copains de "Barry" Obama
"Nous sommes si fiers de lui!": 40 ans après avoir essuyé les mêmes bancs d'école, les anciens camarades de Barack Obama en Indonésie ont salué la victoire de "Barry", qui leur avait annoncé qu'il deviendrait un jour président des Etats-Unis. la suite
Les principaux points du premier discours d'Obama après son élection
Voici les principaux points du premier discours de Barack Obama en tant que président élu des Etats-Unis, devant une foule de partisans dans son fief de Chicago (Illinois, nord). la suite
John McCain: le héros du Vietnam n'a pas su conquérir l'Amérique
John McCain, qui a largement axé sa campagne sur son patriotisme forgé dans les geôles nord-vietnamiennes, n'a pas su conquérir l'Amérique après huit années d'une administration républicaine rejetée mardi par les électeurs. la suite
Election présidentielle américaine: les résultats Etat par Etat
Voici une totalisation des résultats de l'élection présidentielle américaine à partir des estimations diffusées par les télévisions. la suite
L'administration Obama pourrait avoir un air de déjà vu chez Clinton
Barack Obama, élu mardi président des Etats-Unis, pourrait puiser les principaux noms de sa future administration parmi ses conseillers de campagne ainsi que chez d'anciens membres du cabinet de Bill Clinton, le précédent président démocrate. la suite
Victoire écrasante de Barack Obama, premier président noir des Etats-Unis ( contient une vidéo )
Le démocrate Barack Obama a remporté mardi une victoire historique et écrasante sur son adversaire républicain John McCain, devenant, à seulement 47 ans, le premier Noir élu président des Etats-Unis. la suite
Irak, processus de paix, Iran: les grands chantiers d'Obama au Moyen-Orient
George Bush avait promis la liberté pour le "Grand Moyen-Orient". Son successeur, le démocrate Barack Obama, hérite d'un chantier aussi vaste que complexe avec un Irak en guerre, un processus de paix israélo-palestinien au point mort et un Iran en pleine nucléarisation. la suite
Obama, une "chance de renouveau" pour les relations russo-américaines
L'élection du démocrate Barack Obama à la Maison Blanche offre une "chance de renouveau" pour les relations russo-américaines, qui avaient retrouvé des airs de guerre froide sous la présidence de George W. Bush, estiment des experts russes. la suite
Les principaux points du programme du démocrate Barack Obama
Voici les principaux points du programme de Barack Obama, qui prendra le 20 janvier ses fonctions de président des Etats-Unis. Il devra s'atteler à une série de difficultés économiques d'une ampleur sans précédent depuis la grande crise de 1929 alors que le pays se trouve au bord de la récession. la suite
De l'esclavage à la Maison Blanche: l'émancipation des Noirs américains
De l'arrivée en 1619 des premiers esclaves africains sur les côtes de la colonie britannique de Virginie à l'élection de Barack Obama à la Maison Blanche, voici les grandes dates de l'émancipation des Noirs américains et de leur lutte pour l'égalité. la suite
Michelle Obama, la première "First Lady" noire va entrer à la Maison Blanche
"Je suis une anomalie statistique. Une fille noire, élevée dans le South Side de Chicago... Je ne devrais absolument pas être là", dit Michelle Obama, qui va devenir la première First Lady noire après la victoire de son mari Barack, élu mardi président des Etats-Unis. la suite
Barack Obama taxera les plus riches pour favoriser tous les autres
Le démocrate Barack Obama, vainqueur mardi de l'élection présidentielle aux Etats-Unis, a prévu de taxer les plus riches pour venir en aide à la classe moyenne et aux petites entreprises, dans un pays au bord de la récession. la suite
La nouvelle diplomatie promise par Obama confrontée à de redoutables défis
Barack Obama devra s'attaquer dès janvier sur la scène internationale à de redoutables défis qui risquent de limiter les changements que le futur président a promis en matière diplomatique. la suite
Victoire d'Obama, premier président noir des Etats-Unis
Le démocrate Barack Obama a remporté mardi une victoire historique, devenant le premier Noir élu président des Etats-Unis. la suite
Musique country, anxiété et résignation au QG républicain
L'atmosphère était calme, sur fond de musique country, mardi soir à la soirée électorale de John McCain alors que les premiers résultats donnaient une avance au candidat démocrate Barack Obama à l'élection présidentielle. la suite
La liesse s'empare du parc de Chicago d'où Obama doit parler
La liesse s'est emparée mardi soir des milliers de partisans de Barack Obama rassemblés dans un parc de Chicago (Illinois, nord), au fur et à mesure de l'arrivée de résultats favorables à celui qui pourrait devenir le premier président noir des Etats-Unis. la suite